Pro A12-8800B vs Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) outperforms Pro A12-8800B by a whopping 1628% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Pro A12-8800B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 167 | 2090 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M4 | AMD Carrizo |
| Power efficiency | 82.78 | 4.38 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Carrizo (2015−2018) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 3 June 2015 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Pro A12-8800B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.592 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 2048 KB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3100 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Pro A12-8800B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | FP4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 12-35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Pro A12-8800B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | HSA 1.0 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | FMA4 |
| AVX | - | AVX |
| FreeSync | - | + |
| TrueAudio | - | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| PowerGating | - | + |
| Out-of-band client management | - | + |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
| RAID | - | + |
| HSA | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Pro A12-8800B are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Pro A12-8800B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR3/DDR3L-2133 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Apple M4 16-core GPU | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| iGPU core count | no data | 8 |
| Number of pipelines | no data | 512 |
| Enduro | - | + |
| Switchable graphics | - | + |
| UVD | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Pro A12-8800B integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Pro A12-8800B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Pro A12-8800B.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 27.99 | 1.62 |
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 3 June 2015 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 12 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) has a 1627.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.
Pro A12-8800B, on the other hand, has 166.7% lower power consumption.
The Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Pro A12-8800B in performance tests.
Note that Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is a desktop processor while Pro A12-8800B is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Pro A12-8800B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
