FX-8800P vs Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2024
12 cores / 12 threads, 32 Watt
27.99
+1464%
FX-8800P
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.79

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) outperforms FX-8800P by a whopping 1464% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and FX-8800P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1672020
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesApple M4AMD Carrizo
Power efficiency82.7811.29
Architecture codenameno dataCarrizo (2015−2018)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)2 June 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and FX-8800P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed2.592 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz3.4 GHz
L2 cache4 MB2048 KB
Chip lithography3 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data250 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and FX-8800P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFP4
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and FX-8800P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHSA 1.0
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and FX-8800P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and FX-8800P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3-2133
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M4 16-core GPUAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and FX-8800P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and FX-8800P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and FX-8800P.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.99 1.79
Recency 30 October 2024 2 June 2015
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 3 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 15 Watt

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) has a 1463.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

FX-8800P, on the other hand, has 113.3% lower power consumption.

The Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8800P in performance tests.

Note that Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is a desktop processor while FX-8800P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and FX-8800P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
M4 Pro (12 cores)
AMD FX-8800P
FX-8800P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 102 votes

Rate FX-8800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) or FX-8800P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.