Celeron N4000C vs Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) outperforms Celeron N4000C by a whopping 3045% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N4000C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 167 | 2553 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | Apple M4 | no data |
Power efficiency | 82.78 | 14.04 |
Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 1 April 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N4000C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 12 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.592 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
L2 cache | 4 MB | no data |
L3 cache | no data | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 deg C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N4000C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | no data | FCBGA1090 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N4000C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2 |
AES-NI | - | + |
vPro | no data | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | no data | - |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Smart Response | no data | - |
GPIO | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Security technologies
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N4000C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
MPX | - | + |
Identity Protection | - | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N4000C are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N4000C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s |
Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Apple M4 16-core GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
Max video memory | no data | 8 GB |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 650 MHz |
Execution Units | no data | 12 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N4000C integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
MIPI-DSI | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N4000C integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | no data | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N4000C integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | 12 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.4 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N4000C.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 6 |
USB revision | no data | 2.0/3.0 |
Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 2 |
Number of USB ports | no data | 8 |
Integrated LAN | no data | - |
UART | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 27.99 | 0.89 |
Recency | 30 October 2024 | 1 April 2019 |
Physical cores | 12 | 2 |
Threads | 12 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 6 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) has a 3044.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron N4000C, on the other hand, has 433.3% lower power consumption.
The Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4000C in performance tests.
Note that Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is a desktop processor while Celeron N4000C is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N4000C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.