A9-9425 vs Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2024
12 cores / 12 threads, 32 Watt
27.69
+1519%
A9-9425
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.71

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) outperforms A9-9425 by a whopping 1519% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing M4 Pro (12 cores) and A9-9425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1702048
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesApple M4AMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency82.4610.86
Architecture codenameno dataStoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

M4 Pro (12 cores) and A9-9425 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2.592 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography3 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on M4 Pro (12 cores) and A9-9425 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFT4
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and A9-9425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and A9-9425 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and A9-9425. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M4 16-core GPUAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.69 1.71
Recency 30 October 2024 31 May 2016
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 3 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 15 Watt

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) has a 1519.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

A9-9425, on the other hand, has 113.3% lower power consumption.

The M4 Pro (12 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9425 in performance tests.

Note that Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is a desktop processor while A9-9425 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and A9-9425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
M4 Pro (12 cores)
AMD A9-9425
A9-9425

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 25 votes

Rate M4 Pro (12 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1540 votes

Rate A9-9425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M4 Pro (12 cores) or A9-9425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.