Ryzen 7 7800X vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)

VS

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 7 7800X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking165not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesApple M4AMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency29.33no data
Architecture codenameno dataZen 4
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 7 7800X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speedno data4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz5 GHz
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cacheno data8 MB
L3 cacheno data96 MB
Chip lithography3 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data71+122 mm
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 7 7800X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt120 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 7 7800X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M4 40-core GPUno data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 16 8
Chip lithography 3 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 120 Watt

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has 100% more physical cores, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 7 7800X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 7800X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 7 7800X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X
Ryzen 7 7800X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 126 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Max (16 cores) or Ryzen 7 7800X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.