Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
Aggregate performance score
M4 Max (16 cores) outperforms Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 by a whopping 16533% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 253 | 3573 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M4 | Pentium 4-M |
| Designer | Apple | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (1 year ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
M4 Max (16 cores) and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 130 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Max (16 cores) and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 MB | 512 KB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 40-core GPU | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 24.95 | 0.15 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 1 |
| Threads | 16 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 512 Watt |
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has a 16533.3% higher aggregate performance score, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, a 4233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 12700% lower power consumption.
The Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
