N200 vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) outperforms N200 by a whopping 779% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing M4 Max (16 cores) and N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 167 | 1620 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 29.43 | 50.19 |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 1 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M4 Max (16 cores) and N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | no data |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Max (16 cores) and N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 6 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 40-core GPU | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 27.79 | 3.16 |
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 1 January 2023 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 6 Watt |
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has a 779.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 300% more threads.
N200, on the other hand, has 1400% lower power consumption.
The M4 Max (16 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the N200 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
