7 245HX vs Apple M4 Max 16-Core
Aggregate performance score
M4 Max 16-Core outperforms Core 7 245HX by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 289 | 312 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Arrow Lake |
| Designer | Apple | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Arrow Lake-HX (2025−2026) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (1 year ago) | 1 April 2026 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of M4 Max 16-Core and Core 7 245HX: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 14 |
| Base clock speed | 2.592 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 24 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 26 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Max 16-Core and Core 7 245HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU | Intel Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (300 - 1800 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 25.65 | 24.17 |
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 1 April 2026 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 14 |
| Threads | 16 | 14 |
Apple M4 Max 16-Core has a 6% higher aggregate performance score, and 14% more physical cores and 14% more threads.
7 245HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Apple M4 Max 16-Core and Intel Core 7 245HX.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
