Xeon MP 7040 Dual-Core vs Apple M4 (10 cores)
Primary details
Comparing Apple M4 (10 cores) and Xeon MP 7040 Dual-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 239 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Apple Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 52.24 | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Paxville (2002−2005) |
| Release date | 7 May 2024 (less than a year ago) | December 2005 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M4 (10 cores) and Xeon MP 7040 Dual-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 10 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 16 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | no data | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 28 Million | 200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M4 (10 cores) and Xeon MP 7040 Dual-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | no data | 604 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 135 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 (10 cores) and Xeon MP 7040 Dual-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 10-core GPU | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 10 | 2 |
| Threads | 10 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 135 Watt |
Apple M4 (10 cores) has 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, a 2900% more advanced lithography process, and 237.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Apple M4 (10 cores) and Xeon MP 7040 Dual-Core. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Apple M4 (10 cores) is a desktop processor while Xeon MP 7040 Dual-Core is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 (10 cores) and Xeon MP 7040 Dual-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
