Xeon Phi 31S1P vs Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
Primary details
Comparing M3 Pro 12-Core and Xeon Phi 31S1P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 420 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple M3 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 56.36 | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Knights Corner (2012−2014) |
| Release date | 30 October 2023 (1 year ago) | 17 June 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M3 Pro 12-Core and Xeon Phi 31S1P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 57 (Heptapentaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 228 |
| Base clock speed | 2.748 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.06 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 32 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | no data | 350 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 37000 Million | 5,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M3 Pro 12-Core and Xeon Phi 31S1P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | PCIe x16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 270 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3 Pro 12-Core and Xeon Phi 31S1P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
M3 Pro 12-Core and Xeon Phi 31S1P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M3 Pro 12-Core and Xeon Phi 31S1P are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M3 Pro 12-Core and Xeon Phi 31S1P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3, DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 October 2023 | 17 June 2013 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 57 |
| Threads | 12 | 228 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 270 Watt |
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core has an age advantage of 10 years, a 633.3% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.
Xeon Phi 31S1P, on the other hand, has 375% more physical cores and 1800% more threads.
We couldn't decide between M3 Pro 12-Core and Xeon Phi 31S1P. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M3 Pro 12-Core is a notebook processor while Xeon Phi 31S1P is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Pro 12-Core and Xeon Phi 31S1P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
