Celeron 4205U vs Apple M3 Pro 11-Core

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
2023
11 cores / 11 threads, 27 Watt
15.61
+1715%
Celeron 4205U
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.86

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core outperforms Celeron 4205U by a whopping 1715% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing M3 Pro 11-Core and Celeron 4205U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4432571
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M3Intel Celeron
Power efficiency54.685.42
Architecture codenameno dataWhiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
Release date30 October 2023 (1 year ago)23 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

M3 Pro 11-Core and Celeron 4205U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores11 (Undeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads112
Base clock speed2.748 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.06 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataOPI
Bus rateno data4 GT/s
Multiplierno data18
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors37000 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on M3 Pro 11-Core and Celeron 4205U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataIntel BGA 1528
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3 Pro 11-Core and Celeron 4205U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M3 Pro 11-Core and Celeron 4205U are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M3 Pro 11-Core and Celeron 4205U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPUIntel HD Graphics 610 (300 - 900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M3 Pro 11-Core and Celeron 4205U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 15.61
+1715%
Celeron 4205U 0.86

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 24794
+1714%
Celeron 4205U 1367

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 1913
+1307%
Celeron 4205U 136

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.61 0.86
Recency 30 October 2023 23 January 2019
Physical cores 11 2
Threads 11 2
Chip lithography 3 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 15 Watt

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core has a 1715.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 450% more physical cores and 450% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 4205U, on the other hand, has 80% lower power consumption.

The M3 Pro 11-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 4205U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Celeron 4205U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
M3 Pro 11-Core
Intel Celeron 4205U
Celeron 4205U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 100 votes

Rate M3 Pro 11-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 130 votes

Rate Celeron 4205U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M3 Pro 11-Core or Celeron 4205U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.