Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core
Aggregate performance score
Apple M3 Max 16-Core outperforms Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 206 | 335 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M3 | Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Power efficiency | 31.37 | 63.33 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Strix Point-HX PRO (Zen 5/5c) (2025) |
| Release date | 30 October 2023 (1 year ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 2.748 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.06 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 54 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 233 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 92000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 78 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX+, SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU | AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 25.71 | 18.63 |
| Recency | 30 October 2023 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 12 |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 78 Watt | 28 Watt |
Apple M3 Max 16-Core has a 38% higher aggregate performance score, 33.3% more physical cores, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 50% more threads, and 178.6% lower power consumption.
The M3 Max 16-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
