Atom N280 vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core
Aggregate performance score
Apple M3 Max 16-Core outperforms Atom N280 by a whopping 25750% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Atom N280 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 194 | 3383 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M3 | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 31.36 | 3.79 |
| Architecture codename | no data | DiamondVille (2008−2009) |
| Release date | 30 October 2023 (1 year ago) | 1 February 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Atom N280 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.748 GHz | 1.66 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.06 GHz | 0.07 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 666.66 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 10 |
| L1 cache | no data | 56 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 25.9638 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 92000 Million | 47 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.9V-1.1625V |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Atom N280 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | PBGA437 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 78 Watt | 2.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Atom N280. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
Security technologies
Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Atom N280 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Atom N280 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Atom N280. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 25.85 | 0.10 |
| Recency | 30 October 2023 | 1 February 2009 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 1 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 78 Watt | 2 Watt |
Apple M3 Max 16-Core has a 25750% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 1500% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.
Atom N280, on the other hand, has 3800% lower power consumption.
The Apple M3 Max 16-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N280 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Atom N280, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
