A6-9220 vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M3 Max 16-Core
2023
16 cores / 16 threads, 78 Watt
25.86
+3133%
A6-9220
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.80

Apple M3 Max 16-Core outperforms A6-9220 by a whopping 3133% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing M3 Max 16-Core and A6-9220 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1942612
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M3Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency31.365.04
Architecture codenameno dataStoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date30 October 2023 (1 year ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

M3 Max 16-Core and A6-9220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2.748 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.06 GHz2.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data160 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
Chip lithography3 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors92000 Million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on M3 Max 16-Core and A6-9220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataBGA
Power consumption (TDP)78 Watt10-15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3 Max 16-Core and A6-9220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M3 Max 16-Core and A6-9220 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M3 Max 16-Core and A6-9220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPUAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 25.86
+3133%
A6-9220 0.80

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 41076
+3114%
A6-9220 1278

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 3264
+2827%
A6-9220 112

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 271
+296%
A6-9220 69

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.86 0.80
Recency 30 October 2023 1 June 2016
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 3 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 78 Watt 10 Watt

Apple M3 Max 16-Core has a 3132.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

A6-9220, on the other hand, has 680% lower power consumption.

The M3 Max 16-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9220 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and A6-9220, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M3 Max 16-Core
M3 Max 16-Core
AMD A6-9220
A6-9220

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 276 votes

Rate M3 Max 16-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 404 votes

Rate A6-9220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M3 Max 16-Core or A6-9220, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.