Ultra 5 238V vs Apple M3 Max 14-Core
Aggregate performance score
Apple M3 Max 14-Core outperforms Core Ultra 5 238V by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Apple M3 Max 14-Core and Core Ultra 5 238V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 226 | 525 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M3 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 27.88 | 78.16 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Lunar Lake (2024) |
| Release date | 30 October 2023 (1 year ago) | 24 September 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M3 Max 14-Core and Core Ultra 5 238V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 14 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.748 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.06 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 37 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 192 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 2.5 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 92000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M3 Max 14-Core and Core Ultra 5 238V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | Intel BGA 2833 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 78 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M3 Max 14-Core and Core Ultra 5 238V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Apple M3 Max 14-Core and Core Ultra 5 238V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M3 Max 14-Core and Core Ultra 5 238V are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M3 Max 14-Core and Core Ultra 5 238V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU | Arc 130V |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M3 Max 14-Core and Core Ultra 5 238V.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 22.98 | 14.04 |
| Recency | 30 October 2023 | 24 September 2024 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 8 |
| Threads | 14 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 78 Watt | 17 Watt |
Apple M3 Max 14-Core has a 63.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 75% more physical cores and 75% more threads.
Ultra 5 238V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and 358.8% lower power consumption.
The Apple M3 Max 14-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 5 238V in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Max 14-Core and Core Ultra 5 238V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
