Mobile Pentium 4 552 vs Apple M2
Aggregate performance score
M2 outperforms Mobile Pentium 4 552 by a whopping 4389% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1048 | 3536 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple Apple M-Series | Mobile Pentium 4 |
| Power efficiency | 18.01 | 0.09 |
| Designer | Apple | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Prescott (2001−2005) |
| Release date | 10 June 2022 (3 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
M2 and Mobile Pentium 4 552 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.424 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.48 GHz | 3.46 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| L2 cache | 20 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 90 nm |
| Number of transistors | 20000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M2 and Mobile Pentium 4 552 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 88 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.53 | 0.19 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 88 Watt |
Apple M2 has a 4389.5% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 1700% more advanced lithography process, and 340% lower power consumption.
The Apple M2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Mobile Pentium 4 552 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
