FX-6200 vs Apple M2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M2
2022
8 cores / 8 threads, 20 Watt
8.24
+211%

Apple M2 outperforms FX-6200 by a whopping 211% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M2 and FX-6200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking8611636
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.51
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesApple Apple M-Seriesno data
Architecture codenameno dataZambezi (2011−2012)
Release date10 June 2022 (2 years ago)27 February 2012 (12 years ago)
Current priceno data$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Apple M2 and FX-6200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads86
Base clock speed2.424 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.48 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache2 MB288 KB
L2 cache20 MB6144 KB
L3 cacheno data8192 KB
Chip lithography5 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data61 °C
Number of transistors20000 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierNoYes
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Apple M2 and FX-6200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataAM3+
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M2 and FX-6200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M2 and FX-6200 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M2 and FX-6200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M2 and FX-6200.

PCIe versionno datan/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M2 8.24
+211%
FX-6200 2.65

Apple M2 outperforms FX-6200 by 211% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Apple M2 14933
+264%
FX-6200 4105

Apple M2 outperforms FX-6200 by 264% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.24 2.65
Recency 10 June 2022 27 February 2012
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 8 6
Chip lithography 5 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 125 Watt

The Apple M2 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M2 is a notebook processor while FX-6200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M2 and FX-6200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M2
M2
AMD FX-6200
FX-6200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 508 votes

Rate Apple M2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 127 votes

Rate FX-6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M2 or FX-6200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.