Ultra X9 378H vs Apple M2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1109not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple Apple M-SeriesIntel Panther Lake
Power efficiency17.94no data
DesignerAppleIntel
Architecture codenameno dataPanther Lake (2026)
Release date10 June 2022 (4 years ago)5 April 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of M2 and Core Ultra X9 378H: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2.424 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.48 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache2 MBno data
L2 cache20 MB12.5 MB
L3 cacheno data18 MB
Chip lithography5 nm2 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors20000 Millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on M2 and Core Ultra X9 378H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataFCBGA2540
Power consumption (TDP)20 Wattno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ( - 2500 MHz)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 June 2022 5 April 2026
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 2 nm

Ultra X9 378H has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Apple M2 and Intel Core Ultra X9 378H. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 815 votes

Rate M2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra X9 378H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors M2 and Core Ultra X9 378H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.