Ultra 7 265KF vs Apple M2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M2
2022
8 cores / 8 threads, 20 Watt
9.40
Core Ultra 7 265KF
2024
20 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
37.07
+294%

Core Ultra 7 265KF outperforms Apple M2 by a whopping 294% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing M2 and Core Ultra 7 265KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking81489
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data97.72
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesApple Apple M-Seriesno data
Power efficiency44.4828.07
Architecture codenameno dataArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date10 June 2022 (2 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

M2 and Core Ultra 7 265KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads820
Base clock speed2.424 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.48 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache2 MB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache20 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Number of transistors20000 Million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on M2 and Core Ultra 7 265KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data1851
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M2 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

M2 and Core Ultra 7 265KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M2 and Core Ultra 7 265KF are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M2 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M2 and Core Ultra 7 265KF.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M2 9.40
Ultra 7 265KF 37.07
+294%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M2 14933
Ultra 7 265KF 58883
+294%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.40 37.07
Recency 10 June 2022 24 October 2024
Physical cores 8 20
Threads 8 20
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 125 Watt

Apple M2 has 525% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265KF, on the other hand, has a 294.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 265KF is our recommended choice as it beats the M2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M2 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M2 and Core Ultra 7 265KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M2
M2
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Core Ultra 7 265KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 620 votes

Rate M2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 38 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M2 or Core Ultra 7 265KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.