Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) vs Ultra 7 265KF

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 265KF
2024
20 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
36.74
+33.2%
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
2024
12 cores / 12 threads, 32 Watt
27.59

Core Ultra 7 265KF outperforms Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 265KF and M4 Pro (12 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking94177
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation98.31no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M4
Power efficiency27.9782.06
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)no data
Release date24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$379no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 265KF and M4 Pro (12 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Performance-cores8no data
Efficient-cores12no data
Threads2012
Base clock speed3.9 GHz2.592 GHz
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz4.51 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache3 MB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache30 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography3 nm3 nm
Die size243 mm2no data
Number of transistors17,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 265KF and M4 Pro (12 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1851no data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt32 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 265KF and M4 Pro (12 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 265KF and M4 Pro (12 cores) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 265KF and M4 Pro (12 cores) are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 265KF and M4 Pro (12 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR5
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AApple M4 16-core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 265KF and M4 Pro (12 cores).

PCIe version5.0 and 4.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.74 27.59
Physical cores 20 12
Threads 20 12
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 32 Watt

Ultra 7 265KF has a 33.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 66.7% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads.

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores), on the other hand, has 290.6% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 265KF is our recommended choice as it beats the M4 Pro (12 cores) in performance tests.

Note that Core Ultra 7 265KF is a desktop processor while Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
M4 Pro (12 cores)

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 63 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 42 votes

Rate M4 Pro (12 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 7 265KF and M4 Pro (12 cores), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.