A4 PRO-3340B vs Apple M2
Aggregate performance score
Apple M2 outperforms A4 PRO-3340B by a whopping 772% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 948 | 2616 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple Apple M-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 17.96 | 1.65 |
| Designer | Apple | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | no data | Kabini (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 10 June 2022 (3 years ago) | 20 December 2014 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M2 and A4 PRO-3340B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.424 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.48 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| L2 cache | 20 MB | 2048 KB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | no data | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 20000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M2 and A4 PRO-3340B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FT3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M2 and A4 PRO-3340B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | FMA4 |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| PowerGating | - | + |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
| RAID | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M2 and A4 PRO-3340B are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M2 and A4 PRO-3340B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3/DDR3L-1600 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz) | AMD Radeon™ HD 8240 Graphics |
| iGPU core count | no data | 2 |
| จำนวนพาธไลน์ | no data | 128 |
| Enduro | - | + |
| Switchable graphics | - | + |
| UVD | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of M2 and A4 PRO-3340B integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by M2 and A4 PRO-3340B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M2 and A4 PRO-3340B.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.98 | 1.03 |
| Recency | 10 June 2022 | 20 December 2014 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 25 Watt |
Apple M2 has a 771.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.
The Apple M2 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A4 PRO-3340B in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
