Ryzen 7 5825C vs Apple M1
Primary details
Comparing Apple M1 and Ryzen 7 5825C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1194 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple Apple M-Series | AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) |
| Architecture codename | no data | Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 10 November 2020 (4 years ago) | 5 May 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M1 and Ryzen 7 5825C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.064 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 2 MB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 180 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 16000 Million | 10,700 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M1 and Ryzen 7 5825C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M1 and Ryzen 7 5825C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M1 and Ryzen 7 5825C are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M1 and Ryzen 7 5825C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Apple M1 8-Core GPU | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M1 and Ryzen 7 5825C.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 14.54 | 9.04 |
| Recency | 10 November 2020 | 5 May 2022 |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
Apple M1 has 60.8% faster integrated GPU, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen 7 5825C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Apple M1 and Ryzen 7 5825C. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M1 and Ryzen 7 5825C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
