Itanium 9330 vs Apple M1 Pro
Primary details
Comparing Apple M1 Pro and Itanium 9330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 710 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple M-Series | no data |
| Release date | 18 October 2021 (3 years ago) | 1 January 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M1 Pro and Itanium 9330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 10 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.064 GHz | 1.46 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.22 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 2.9 MB | no data |
| L2 cache | 28 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 20 MB L3 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 65 nm |
| Number of transistors | 33700 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M1 Pro and Itanium 9330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | FCLGA1248 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2064 ‑ 3220 Watt | 155 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M1 Pro and Itanium 9330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 1.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| PAE | no data | 50 Bit |
Security technologies
Apple M1 Pro and Itanium 9330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M1 Pro and Itanium 9330 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 18 October 2021 | 1 January 2010 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 4 |
| Threads | 10 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2064 Watt | 155 Watt |
Apple M1 Pro has an age advantage of 11 years, 150% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
Itanium 9330, on the other hand, has 1231.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Apple M1 Pro and Itanium 9330. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M1 Pro is a notebook processor while Itanium 9330 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M1 Pro and Itanium 9330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
