Athlon 64 2700+ vs Apple M1 Pro

VS

Primary details

Comparing Apple M1 Pro and Athlon 64 2700+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking710not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M-Seriesno data
Architecture codenameno dataNewCastle (2004)
Release date18 October 2021 (3 years ago)April 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M1 Pro and Athlon 64 2700+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads101
Base clock speed2.064 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.22 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache2.9 MB128 KB
L2 cache28 MB512 KB
L3 cache24 MB0 KB
Chip lithography5 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data144 mm2
Number of transistors33700 Million69 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Apple M1 Pro and Athlon 64 2700+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data754
Power consumption (TDP)2064 ‑ 3220 Watt32 Watt

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M1 Pro 16-Core GPUno data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 10 1
Threads 10 1
Chip lithography 5 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2064 Watt 32 Watt

Apple M1 Pro has 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 2700+, on the other hand, has 6350% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Apple M1 Pro and Athlon 64 2700+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M1 Pro and Athlon 64 2700+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M1 Pro
M1 Pro
AMD Athlon 64 2700+
Athlon 64 2700+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 402 votes

Rate Apple M1 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Athlon 64 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M1 Pro or Athlon 64 2700+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.