Sempron 3850 vs Apple M1 Max
Aggregate performance score
Apple M1 Max outperforms Sempron 3850 by a whopping 1790% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing M1 Max and Sempron 3850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 533 | 2690 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Apple M-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 2.78 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Kabini (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 18 October 2021 (3 years ago) | 9 April 2014 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M1 Max and Sempron 3850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 10 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.06 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.22 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 2.9 MB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 28 MB | 2048 KB |
| L3 cache | 48 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | no data | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 57000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M1 Max and Sempron 3850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M1 Max and Sempron 3850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | FMA4 |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| PowerGating | - | + |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M1 Max and Sempron 3850 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M1 Max and Sempron 3850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3-1600 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU | AMD Radeon R3 Graphics |
| จำนวนพาธไลน์ | no data | 128 |
| Enduro | - | + |
| Switchable graphics | - | + |
| UVD | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of M1 Max and Sempron 3850 integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by M1 Max and Sempron 3850 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M1 Max and Sempron 3850.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.80 | 0.73 |
| Recency | 18 October 2021 | 9 April 2014 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 4 |
| Threads | 10 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
Apple M1 Max has a 1790.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.
The M1 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 3850 in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M1 Max is a notebook processor while Sempron 3850 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M1 Max and Sempron 3850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
