Apple M1 Max vs Sempron 3500+
Primary details
Comparing Sempron 3500+ and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 526 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Apple M-Series |
| Architecture codename | Palermo (2001−2005) | no data |
| Release date | 1 October 2005 (19 years ago) | 18 October 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $167 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Sempron 3500+ and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 10 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.06 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.22 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 2.9 MB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 48 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 103 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 63 million | 57000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Sempron 3500+ and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 939 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 2060 ‑ 3220 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 3500+ and Apple M1 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2005 | 18 October 2021 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 10 |
| Threads | 1 | 10 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 2060 Watt |
Sempron 3500+ has 3222.6% lower power consumption.
Apple M1 Max, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Sempron 3500+ and Apple M1 Max. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Sempron 3500+ is a desktop processor while Apple M1 Max is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 3500+ and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
