Ryzen Z2 vs Apple M1 Max
Aggregate performance score
Apple M1 Max outperforms Ryzen Z2 by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 573 | 1031 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M-Series | AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 26.17 |
| Designer | Apple | AMD |
| Architecture codename | no data | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 18 October 2021 (3 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
M1 Max and Ryzen Z2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 10 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.06 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.22 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 2.9 MB | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 28 MB | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 48 MB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 57000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M1 Max and Ryzen Z2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M1 Max and Ryzen Z2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M1 Max and Ryzen Z2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU | AMD Radeon 780M |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.79 | 7.65 |
| Recency | 18 October 2021 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 8 |
| Threads | 10 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
Apple M1 Max has a 80.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 25% more physical cores.
Ryzen Z2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 60% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.
The Apple M1 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Z2 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
