MediaTek Kompanio 520 vs Ambiq Apollo 3.5
Primary details
Comparing Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | MediaTek Kompanio 500 |
| Architecture codename | Cortex-M4F | 2x Cortex-A76 / 6x A55 |
| Release date | no data | no data |
Detailed specifications
Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 7 nm |
MediaTek Kompanio 520 has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and MediaTek Kompanio 520. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ambiq Apollo 3.5 and MediaTek Kompanio 520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
