Ryzen Z2 Extreme vs A9-9425

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

A9-9425
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.56
Ryzen Z2 Extreme
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 8 Watt
13.72
+779%

Ryzen Z2 Extreme outperforms A9-9425 by a whopping 779% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2312607
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Power efficiency11.15no data
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025)
Release date31 May 2016 (9 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

A9-9425 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die size124.5 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A9-9425 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT4FP8
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt8 MB + 16 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9425 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRANDUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9425 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9425 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)AMD Radeon 890M

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A9-9425 1.56
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 13.72
+779%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A9-9425 1519
Samples: 529
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 24177
+1492%
Samples: 7

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A9-9425 2686
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 8361
+211%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A9-9425 4338
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 43834
+910%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A9-9425 25.83
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 8
+223%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

A9-9425 125
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 2261
+1709%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

A9-9425 76
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 275
+262%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

A9-9425 1
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 10.5
+1005%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.56 13.72
Integrated graphics card 1.31 19.28
Recency 31 May 2016 6 January 2025
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 8 Watt

Ryzen Z2 Extreme has a 779.5% higher aggregate performance score, 1371.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 87.5% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A9-9425 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9425
A9-9425
AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme
Ryzen Z2 Extreme

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1582 votes

Rate A9-9425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 58 votes

Rate Ryzen Z2 Extreme on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A9-9425 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.