E1-2100 vs A9-9420e

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A9-9420e
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.69
+176%
E1-2100
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 9 Watt
0.25

A9-9420e outperforms E1-2100 by a whopping 176% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A9-9420e and E1-2100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27533189
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD E-Series
Power efficiency4.382.65
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date1 June 2018 (6 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A9-9420e and E1-2100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speedno data1 GHz
L2 cache1 MB1024 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size124.5 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistors1200 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A9-9420e and E1-2100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAFT3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9420e and E1-2100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, BMI1, ABM, SVM, AES-NI
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9420e and E1-2100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9420e and E1-2100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)AMD Radeon HD 8210
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A9-9420e and E1-2100 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A9-9420e and E1-2100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9420e and E1-2100.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A9-9420e 0.69
+176%
E1-2100 0.25

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A9-9420e 1107
+172%
E1-2100 407

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

A9-9420e 97
+169%
E1-2100 36

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 0.25
Integrated graphics card 1.41 0.47
Recency 1 June 2018 23 May 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 9 Watt

A9-9420e has a 176% higher aggregate performance score, 200% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 5 years.

E1-2100, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

The A9-9420e is our recommended choice as it beats the E1-2100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9420e and E1-2100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9420e
A9-9420e
AMD E1-2100
E1-2100

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 150 votes

Rate A9-9420e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 324 votes

Rate E1-2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9420e or E1-2100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.