Athlon 750 vs A9-9420

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A9-9420 and Athlon 750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2502not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency5.96no data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Thunderbird (1999−2000)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)29 November 1999 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Detailed specifications

A9-9420 and Athlon 750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz0.75 GHz
L1 cache160 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (shared)512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm180 nm
Die size125 mm2102 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C70 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million22 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A9-9420 and Athlon 750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT4A
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9420 and Athlon 750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9420 and Athlon 750 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9420 and Athlon 750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon R5N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9420 and Athlon 750.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2016 29 November 1999
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

A9-9420 has an age advantage of 16 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A9-9420 and Athlon 750. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A9-9420 is a notebook processor while Athlon 750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9420 and Athlon 750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9420
A9-9420
AMD Athlon 750
Athlon 750

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 510 votes

Rate A9-9420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate Athlon 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9420 or Athlon 750, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.