5 210H vs A8 Pro-7150B
Aggregate performance score
Core 5 210H outperforms A8 Pro-7150B by a whopping 1129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2729 | 784 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 24.30 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Kaveri | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.94 | 10.04 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 4 June 2014 (11 years ago) | 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $342 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
A8 Pro-7150B and Core 5 210H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 4 |
| Efficient-cores | no data | 4 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 245 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 2410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on A8 Pro-7150B and Core 5 210H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP3 | FCBGA1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 19 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8 Pro-7150B and Core 5 210H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| FRTC | + | - |
| TrueAudio | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| PowerGating | + | - |
| Out-of-band client management | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| RAID | + | - |
| HSA | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
A8 Pro-7150B and Core 5 210H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8 Pro-7150B and Core 5 210H are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8 Pro-7150B and Core 5 210H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1600 | DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 96 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | Intel® Graphics |
| iGPU core count | 6 | no data |
| จำนวนพาธไลน์ | 384 | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Enduro | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.4 GHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 48 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A8 Pro-7150B and Core 5 210H integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 4 |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by A8 Pro-7150B and Core 5 210H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A8 Pro-7150B and Core 5 210H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12.1 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8 Pro-7150B and Core 5 210H.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.87 | 10.69 |
| Recency | 4 June 2014 | 18 December 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 19 Watt | 45 Watt |
A8 Pro-7150B has 136.8% lower power consumption.
5 210H, on the other hand, has a 1128.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and 100% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
The Intel Core 5 210H is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A8 Pro-7150B in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
