Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) vs A8-7410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-7410
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.77
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
2010
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
3.21
+81.4%

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) outperforms A8-7410 by an impressive 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-7410 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19311526
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.54
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Thuban (2010)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)1 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Current price$415 $50

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-7410 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads46
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data346 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors930 Million904 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A8-7410 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4AM3
Power consumption (TDP)12 - 25 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7410 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT, AMD-Vno data
AES-NI+no data
FMAFMA4no data
AVX+no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7410 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7410 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1866DDR3
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 Graphicsno data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7410 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7410 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7410 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W).

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-7410 1.77
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) 3.21
+81.4%

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) outperforms A8-7410 by 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A8-7410 2741
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) 4965
+81.1%

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) outperforms A8-7410 by 81% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.77 3.21
Recency 7 May 2015 1 May 2010
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 6
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 95 Watt

The Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-7410 in performance tests.

Be aware that A8-7410 is a notebook processor while Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7410 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7410
A8-7410
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 633 votes

Rate A8-7410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1570 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-7410 or Phenom II X6 1055T (95W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.