Ultra 9 295HX vs A8-7410
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2354 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD A-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 4.42 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Carrizo-L (2015) | Arrow Lake-HX (2025) |
| Release date | 7 May 2015 (11 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of A8-7410 and Core Ultra 9 295HX: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 930 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on A8-7410 and Core Ultra 9 295HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FP4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7410 and Core Ultra 9 295HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT, AMD-V | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | FMA4 | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| PowerGating | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7410 and Core Ultra 9 295HX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7410 and Core Ultra 9 295HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1866 | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | no data |
| Enduro | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A8-7410 and Core Ultra 9 295HX integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A8-7410 and Core Ultra 9 295HX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
| Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7410 and Core Ultra 9 295HX.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 24 |
| Threads | 4 | 24 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
A8-7410 has 267% lower power consumption.
Ultra 9 295HX, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.
We couldn't decide between AMD A8-7410 and Intel Core Ultra 9 295HX. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
