7 160UL vs A8-7410
Primary details
Comparing A8-7410 and Core 7 160UL processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2033 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD A-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 6.55 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Carrizo-L (2015) | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) |
| Release date | 7 May 2015 (9 years ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
A8-7410 and Core 7 160UL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 930 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on A8-7410 and Core 7 160UL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP4 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 - 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7410 and Core 7 160UL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT, AMD-V | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | FMA4 | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| PowerGating | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
A8-7410 and Core 7 160UL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7410 and Core 7 160UL are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7410 and Core 7 160UL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1866 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |
| Enduro | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A8-7410 and Core 7 160UL integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A8-7410 and Core 7 160UL integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
| Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7410 and Core 7 160UL.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 May 2015 | 8 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 10 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 15 Watt |
A8-7410 has 25% lower power consumption.
7 160UL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 150% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between A8-7410 and Core 7 160UL. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A8-7410 is a notebook processor while Core 7 160UL is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7410 and Core 7 160UL, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
