Celeron G550 vs A8-7410

Primary details

Comparing A8-7410 and Celeron G550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2046	2628
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	1.65
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	AMD A-Series	no data
Power efficiency	6.55	1.15
Architecture codename	Carrizo-L (2015)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date	7 May 2015 (9 years ago)	1 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$80

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

A8-7410 and Celeron G550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	2.2 GHz	2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.5 GHz	2.6 GHz
Bus rate	no data	5 GT/s
L1 cache	no data	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	2048 KB	256 KB (per core)
L3 cache	no data	2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	28 nm	32 nm
Die size	no data	131 mm2
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	69 °C
Number of transistors	930 Million	504 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on A8-7410 and Celeron G550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	FP4	FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)	12 - 25 Watt	65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7410 and Celeron G550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	MMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT, AMD-V	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI	+	-
FMA	FMA4	-
AVX	+	-
PowerNow	+	-
PowerGating	+	-
VirusProtect	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	-
Idle States	no data	+
Thermal Monitoring	-	+
Flex Memory Access	no data	+
FDI	no data	+
Fast Memory Access	no data	+

Security technologies

A8-7410 and Celeron G550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	-
EDB	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7410 and Celeron G550 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	-
VT-d	no data	-
VT-x	no data	+
EPT	no data	+
IOMMU 2.0	+	-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7410 and Celeron G550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3L-1866	DDR3
Maximum memory size	no data	32 GB
Max memory channels	1	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	17 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics	Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors
Enduro	+	-
Switchable graphics	+	-
UVD	+	-
VCE	+	-
Graphics max frequency	no data	1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7410 and Celeron G550 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	no data	2
DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7410 and Celeron G550 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	no data
Vulkan	+	-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7410 and Celeron G550.

PCIe version

2.0

2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	1.73	0.79
Recency	7 May 2015	1 June 2012
Physical cores	4	2
Threads	4	2
Chip lithography	28 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	65 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7410 and Celeron G550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---