A6-9550 vs A8-7410
Primary details
Comparing A8-7410 and A6-9550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2031 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | AMD A-Series | no data |
Power efficiency | 6.55 | no data |
Architecture codename | Carrizo-L (2015) | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
Release date | 7 May 2015 (9 years ago) | 27 July 2017 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A8-7410 and A6-9550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 4 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | no data | 246 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
Number of transistors | 930 Million | 1,178 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on A8-7410 and A6-9550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | FP4 | AM4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 - 25 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7410 and A6-9550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT, AMD-V | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | FMA4 | + |
AVX | + | + |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7410 and A6-9550 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7410 and A6-9550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3L-1866 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | Radeon R5 |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A8-7410 and A6-9550 integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A8-7410 and A6-9550 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7410 and A6-9550.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 7 May 2015 | 27 July 2017 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 65 Watt |
A8-7410 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 441.7% lower power consumption.
A6-9550, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.
We couldn't decide between A8-7410 and A6-9550. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A8-7410 is a notebook processor while A6-9550 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7410 and A6-9550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.