Solo T1200 vs A8-7100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-7100
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 19 Watt
1.03
+544%
Core Solo T1200
2006
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.16

A8-7100 outperforms Core Solo T1200 by a whopping 544% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-7100 and Core Solo T1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24553304
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriCore Solo
Power efficiency5.130.56
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)January 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-7100 and Core Solo T1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rateno data667 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cache4096 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die size245 mm290 mm2
Number of transistors2410 Million151 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-7100 and Core Solo T1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP3479
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7100 and Core Solo T1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7100 and Core Solo T1200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7100 and Core Solo T1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR1
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count4no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7100 and Core Solo T1200 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7100 and Core Solo T1200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7100 and Core Solo T1200.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-7100 1.03
+544%
Solo T1200 0.16

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A8-7100 33.23
+249%
Solo T1200 116

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.03 0.16
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 27 Watt

A8-7100 has a 543.8% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 42.1% lower power consumption.

The A8-7100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Solo T1200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7100 and Core Solo T1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7100
A8-7100
Intel Core Solo T1200
Core Solo T1200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 30 votes

Rate A8-7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate Core Solo T1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-7100 or Core Solo T1200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.