Pentium P6100 vs A8-6500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-6500
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.82
+219%

A8-6500 outperforms Pentium P6100 by a whopping 219% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-6500 and Pentium P6100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19592764
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Pentium
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)26 September 2010 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$12

Detailed specifications

A8-6500 and Pentium P6100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus supportno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB3 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A8-6500 and Pentium P6100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFM2PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-6500 and Pentium P6100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMAno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+

Security technologies

A8-6500 and Pentium P6100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-6500 and Pentium P6100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-6500 and Pentium P6100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17.051 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8570DIntel HD Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-6500 and Pentium P6100.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-6500 1.82
+219%
Pentium P6100 0.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-6500 2822
+221%
Pentium P6100 880

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A8-6500 441
+62.7%
Pentium P6100 271

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A8-6500 1037
+133%
Pentium P6100 446

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.82 0.57
Recency 1 June 2013 26 September 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

A8-6500 has a 219.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Pentium P6100, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

The A8-6500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium P6100 in performance tests.

Note that A8-6500 is a desktop processor while Pentium P6100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-6500 and Pentium P6100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-6500
A8-6500
Intel Pentium P6100
Pentium P6100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 98 votes

Rate A8-6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 174 votes

Rate Pentium P6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-6500 or Pentium P6100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.