Xeon Platinum 8592 vs A8-3800

VS

Primary details

Comparing A8-3800 and Xeon Platinum 8592 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2271not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.88no data
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)no data
Release date30 June 2011 (13 years ago)1 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-3800 and Xeon Platinum 8592 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads4128
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KB320 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size228 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data81 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A8-3800 and Xeon Platinum 8592 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM1FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-3800 and Xeon Platinum 8592. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A8-3800 and Xeon Platinum 8592 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3800 and Xeon Platinum 8592 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3800 and Xeon Platinum 8592. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5 @ 5600 MT/s (1 DPC)
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6550Dno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-3800 and Xeon Platinum 8592.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 June 2011 1 October 2023
Physical cores 4 64
Threads 4 128
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 350 Watt

A8-3800 has 438.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8592, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between A8-3800 and Xeon Platinum 8592. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A8-3800 is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8592 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-3800 and Xeon Platinum 8592, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-3800
A8-3800
Intel Xeon Platinum 8592
Xeon Platinum 8592

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 69 votes

Rate A8-3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 24 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8592 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-3800 or Xeon Platinum 8592, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.