Ryzen 5 7520U vs A8-6410

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A8-6410
2014
4 cores / 4 threads
1.14

Ryzen 5 7520U outperforms A8-6410 by a whopping 428% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-6410 and Ryzen 5 7520U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22651008
Place by popularitynot in top-1005
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesMendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Mendocino-U (Zen 2)
Release date1 June 2014 (9 years ago)20 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Current price$334 no data

Detailed specifications

A8-6410 and Ryzen 5 7520U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data100 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors930 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A8-6410 and Ryzen 5 7520U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3bFP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-6410 and Ryzen 5 7520U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTLPDDR5-5500 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4no data
AVX++
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-6410 and Ryzen 5 7520U are enumerated here.

AMD-V1+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-6410 and Ryzen 5 7520U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1866DDR5
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 GraphicsAMD Radeon 610M
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-6410 and Ryzen 5 7520U integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-6410 and Ryzen 5 7520U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-6410 and Ryzen 5 7520U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-6410 1.14
Ryzen 5 7520U 6.02
+428%

Ryzen 5 7520U outperforms A8-6410 by 428% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A8-6410 1766
Ryzen 5 7520U 9311
+427%

Ryzen 5 7520U outperforms A8-6410 by 427% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-6410 219
Ryzen 5 7520U 1206
+451%

Ryzen 5 7520U outperforms A8-6410 by 451% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-6410 581
Ryzen 5 7520U 3817
+557%

Ryzen 5 7520U outperforms A8-6410 by 557% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A8-6410 165
Ryzen 5 7520U 834
+405%

Ryzen 5 7520U outperforms A8-6410 by 405% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A8-6410 49
Ryzen 5 7520U 169
+244%

Ryzen 5 7520U outperforms A8-6410 by 244% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.14 6.02
Integrated graphics card 2.84
Recency 1 June 2014 20 September 2022
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm

The Ryzen 5 7520U is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-6410 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-6410 and Ryzen 5 7520U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-6410
A8-6410
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
Ryzen 5 7520U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 303 votes

Rate A8-6410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1066 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7520U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-6410 or Ryzen 5 7520U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.