PRO A6-8570E vs Athlon X4 950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X4 950
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.26
+119%
PRO A6-8570E
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
1.03

Athlon X4 950 outperforms PRO A6-8570E by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 950 and PRO A6-8570E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18142438
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.66no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.291.50
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$60no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 950 and PRO A6-8570E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size246 mm2250 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 950 and PRO A6-8570E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 950 and PRO A6-8570E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 950 and PRO A6-8570E are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 950 and PRO A6-8570E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-2400
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
Switchable graphics-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon X4 950 and PRO A6-8570E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-n/a

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon X4 950 and PRO A6-8570E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 950 and PRO A6-8570E.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X4 950 2.26
+119%
PRO A6-8570E 1.03

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X4 950 3596
+119%
PRO A6-8570E 1642

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.26 1.03
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2

Athlon X4 950 has a 119.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Athlon X4 950 is our recommended choice as it beats the PRO A6-8570E in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 950 and PRO A6-8570E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 950
Athlon X4 950
AMD PRO A6-8570E
PRO A6-8570E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 284 votes

Rate Athlon X4 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 13 votes

Rate PRO A6-8570E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 950 or PRO A6-8570E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.