E2-6110 vs A8-6410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-6410
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.14
+56.2%

A8-6410 outperforms E2-6110 by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-6410 and E2-6110 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22882584
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD E-Series
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Beema (2014)
Release date1 June 2014 (10 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Current price$334 $289

Detailed specifications

A8-6410 and E2-6110 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.5 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB2048 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors930 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A8-6410 and E2-6110 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFT3bFT3b
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-6410 and E2-6110. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, Single-Channel DDR3L-1600
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4FMA4
AVX++
PowerTune--
TrueAudio--
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
Out-of-band client management--
VirusProtect++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-6410 and E2-6110 are enumerated here.

AMD-V11
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-6410 and E2-6110. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1866DDR3-1600
Max memory channels11

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 GraphicsAMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Enduro++
Switchable graphics11
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-6410 and E2-6110 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-6410 and E2-6110 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-6410 and E2-6110.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-6410 1.14
+56.2%
E2-6110 0.73

A8-6410 outperforms E2-6110 by 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A8-6410 1767
+56.9%
E2-6110 1126

A8-6410 outperforms E2-6110 by 57% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-6410 220
+41.9%
E2-6110 155

A8-6410 outperforms E2-6110 by 42% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-6410 583
+31.9%
E2-6110 442

A8-6410 outperforms E2-6110 by 32% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.14 0.73
Recency 1 June 2014 29 April 2014

The A8-6410 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-6110 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-6410 and E2-6110, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-6410
A8-6410
AMD E2-6110
E2-6110

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 306 votes

Rate A8-6410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 131 vote

Rate E2-6110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-6410 or E2-6110, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.