Core i5-L16G7 vs A8-6410

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A8-6410
2014
4 cores / 4 threads
1.14
Core i5-L16G7
2020
5 cores / 5 threads
2.22
+94.7%

Core i5-L16G7 outperforms A8-6410 by 95% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing A8-6410 and Core i5-L16G7 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22601721
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Ice Lake
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Lakefield (2020)
Release date1 June 2014 (9 years ago)28 May 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$281
Current price$334 no data

Detailed Specifications

A8-6410 and Core i5-L16G7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)5 (Penta-Core)
Threads45
Base clock speed2 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB1.5 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors930 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A8-6410 and Core i5-L16G7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3bFC-CSP1016
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt7 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-6410 and Core i5-L16G7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4no data
AVX+no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSXno data+
Idle Statesno data+
SIPPno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A8-6410 and Core i5-L16G7 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPXno data-
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-6410 and Core i5-L16G7 are enumerated here.

AMD-V1no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-6410 and Core i5-L16G7. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1866LPDDR4X-4267
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Videono data+
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz
Execution Unitsno data64

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-6410 and Core i5-L16G7 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by A8-6410 and Core i5-L16G7 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-6410 and Core i5-L16G7 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DX12
OpenGLno dataOpenGL4.5
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-6410 and Core i5-L16G7.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-6410 1.14
i5-L16G7 2.22
+94.7%

Core i5-L16G7 outperforms A8-6410 by 95% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A8-6410 1766
i5-L16G7 3440
+94.8%

Core i5-L16G7 outperforms A8-6410 by 95% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-6410 219
i5-L16G7 610
+179%

Core i5-L16G7 outperforms A8-6410 by 179% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-6410 581
i5-L16G7 1167
+101%

Core i5-L16G7 outperforms A8-6410 by 101% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A8-6410 1887
i5-L16G7 4079
+116%

Core i5-L16G7 outperforms A8-6410 by 116% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A8-6410 5872
i5-L16G7 9003
+53.3%

Core i5-L16G7 outperforms A8-6410 by 53% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A8-6410 24.3
+17.7%
i5-L16G7 28.6

Core i5-L16G7 outperforms A8-6410 by 18% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A8-6410 2
i5-L16G7 3
+55.9%

Core i5-L16G7 outperforms A8-6410 by 56% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A8-6410 165
i5-L16G7 255
+54.5%

Core i5-L16G7 outperforms A8-6410 by 55% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A8-6410 49
i5-L16G7 90
+82.7%

Core i5-L16G7 outperforms A8-6410 by 83% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A8-6410 0.6
i5-L16G7 1.42
+137%

Core i5-L16G7 outperforms A8-6410 by 137% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.14 2.22
Recency 1 June 2014 28 May 2020
Physical cores 4 5
Threads 4 5
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 7 Watt

The Core i5-L16G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-6410 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-6410 and Core i5-L16G7, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-6410
A8-6410
Intel Core i5-L16G7
Core i5-L16G7

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 301 vote

Rate A8-6410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 23 votes

Rate Core i5-L16G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about A8-6410 or Core i5-L16G7, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.