Core i7-820QM vs A8-5557M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A8-5557M
2013
4 cores / 4 threads
1.18
+1.7%
Core i7-820QM
2009
4 cores / 8 threads
1.16

A8-5557M outperforms Core i7-820QM by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing A8-5557M and Core i7-820QM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22352246
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Core i7
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Clarksfield (2009−2010)
Release date1 June 2013 (10 years old)23 September 2009 (14 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$546
Current price$60 $529 (1x MSRP)

Technical specs

A8-5557M and Core i7-820QM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.73 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.06 GHz
Bus supportno data2500 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm2296 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million774 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A8-5557M and Core i7-820QM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP2FCPGA988,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-5557M and Core i7-820QM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 ControllerIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A8-5557M and Core i7-820QM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-5557M and Core i7-820QM are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-5557M and Core i7-820QM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8550GNone

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-5557M and Core i7-820QM.

PCIe versionno data2
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-5557M 1.18
+1.7%
i7-820QM 1.16

A8-5557M outperforms Core i7-820QM by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A8-5557M 1801
+1.5%
i7-820QM 1774

A8-5557M outperforms Core i7-820QM by 2% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-5557M 363
i7-820QM 385
+6.1%

Core i7-820QM outperforms A8-5557M by 6% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-5557M 1011
i7-820QM 1014
+0.3%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A8-5557M 2115
i7-820QM 3272
+54.7%

Core i7-820QM outperforms A8-5557M by 55% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A8-5557M 5259
i7-820QM 8559
+62.7%

Core i7-820QM outperforms A8-5557M by 63% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A8-5557M 2747
i7-820QM 3149
+14.6%

Core i7-820QM outperforms A8-5557M by 15% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A8-5557M 26.82
+56.7%
i7-820QM 42.04

Core i7-820QM outperforms A8-5557M by 57% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A8-5557M 2
i7-820QM 3
+55%

Core i7-820QM outperforms A8-5557M by 55% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.18 1.16
Recency 1 June 2013 23 September 2009
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

We couldn't decide between A8-5557M and Core i7-820QM. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-5557M and Core i7-820QM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-5557M
A8-5557M
Intel Core i7-820QM
Core i7-820QM

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 20 votes

Rate AMD A8-5557M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 33 votes

Rate Intel Core i7-820QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-5557M or Core i7-820QM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.