V-Series V140 vs A8-4500M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-4500M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.06
+293%
V-Series V140
2010
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.27

A8-4500M outperforms V-Series V140 by a whopping 293% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-4500M and V-Series V140 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24333138
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD V-Series
Power efficiency2.871.02
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)4 October 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-4500M and V-Series V140 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rateno data3200 MHz
L1 cache192 KB128 KB
L2 cache4 MB (shared)512 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-4500M and V-Series V140 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1r2S1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-4500M and V-Series V140. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-4500M and V-Series V140 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-4500M and V-Series V140. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknownDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7640G (496 - 685 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-4500M 1.06
+293%
V-Series V140 0.27

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A8-4500M 1821
V-Series V140 1913
+5.1%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A8-4500M 2438
+146%
V-Series V140 990

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A8-4500M 31.45
+117%
V-Series V140 68.3

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

A8-4500M 2
+185%
V-Series V140 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.06 0.27
Recency 15 May 2012 4 October 2010
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

A8-4500M has a 292.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

V-Series V140, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.

The A8-4500M is our recommended choice as it beats the V-Series V140 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-4500M and V-Series V140, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-4500M
A8-4500M
AMD V-Series V140
V-Series V140

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 317 votes

Rate A8-4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 46 votes

Rate V-Series V140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-4500M or V-Series V140, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.