Turion 64 X2 TL-64 vs A8-4500M

Aggregate performance score

A8-4500M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.06
+141%
Turion 64 X2 TL-64
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.44

A8-4500M outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-64 by a whopping 141% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-4500M and Turion 64 X2 TL-64 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24172946
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series2x AMD Turion 64
Power efficiency2.871.19
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Trinidad (2006−2007)
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)13 April 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-4500M and Turion 64 X2 TL-64 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache192 KB256 KB
L2 cache4 MB (shared)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size246 mm2147 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million154 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-4500M and Turion 64 X2 TL-64 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1r2S1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-4500M and Turion 64 X2 TL-64. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA65 nm, 1.075
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-4500M and Turion 64 X2 TL-64 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-4500M and Turion 64 X2 TL-64. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknownno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7640Gno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-4500M 1.06
+141%
Turion 64 X2 TL-64 0.44

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-4500M 1689
+144%
Turion 64 X2 TL-64 692

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A8-4500M 1821
+5.5%
Turion 64 X2 TL-64 1726

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A8-4500M 4872
+52.2%
Turion 64 X2 TL-64 3201

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A8-4500M 2438
+60.6%
Turion 64 X2 TL-64 1518

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.06 0.44
Recency 15 May 2012 13 April 2007
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm

A8-4500M has a 140.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

The A8-4500M is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 X2 TL-64 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-4500M and Turion 64 X2 TL-64, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-4500M
A8-4500M
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64
Turion 64 X2 TL-64

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 316 votes

Rate A8-4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 19 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-4500M or Turion 64 X2 TL-64, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.