Celeron G3900TE vs A8-4500M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-4500M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.10
Celeron G3900TE
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.21
+10%

Celeron G3900TE outperforms A8-4500M by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-4500M and Celeron G3900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24122356
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.35
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Celeron
Power efficiency2.873.15
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)19 October 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-4500M and Celeron G3900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data23
L1 cache192 KB128 KB
L2 cache4 MB (shared)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm298.57 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-4500M and Celeron G3900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFS1r2LGA-1151
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-4500M and Celeron G3900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-4500M and Celeron G3900TE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-4500M and Celeron G3900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknownDDR3L-1600
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7640GIntel HD Graphics 510

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-4500M and Celeron G3900TE.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-4500M 1.10
Celeron G3900TE 1.21
+10%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-4500M 1689
Celeron G3900TE 1850
+9.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.10 1.21
Integrated graphics card 1.19 1.61
Recency 15 May 2012 19 October 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm

A8-4500M has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron G3900TE, on the other hand, has a 10% higher aggregate performance score, 35.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A8-4500M and Celeron G3900TE.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-4500M and Celeron G3900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-4500M
A8-4500M
Intel Celeron G3900TE
Celeron G3900TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 315 votes

Rate A8-4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G3900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-4500M or Celeron G3900TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.