Athlon 64 FX-51 vs A8-4500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-4500M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.06
+279%
Athlon 64 FX-51
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 89 Watt
0.28

A8-4500M outperforms Athlon 64 FX-51 by a whopping 279% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-4500M and Athlon 64 FX-51 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24333135
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency2.860.30
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)September 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-4500M and Athlon 64 FX-51 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache192 KB128 KB
L2 cache4 MB (shared)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm130 nm
Die size246 mm2193 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-4500M and Athlon 64 FX-51 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1r2940
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-4500M and Athlon 64 FX-51. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-4500M and Athlon 64 FX-51 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-4500M and Athlon 64 FX-51. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknownno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7640G (496 - 685 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-4500M 1.06
+279%
Athlon 64 FX-51 0.28

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-4500M 1685
+286%
Athlon 64 FX-51 437

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.06 0.28
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 89 Watt

A8-4500M has a 278.6% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 154.3% lower power consumption.

The A8-4500M is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 FX-51 in performance tests.

Be aware that A8-4500M is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 FX-51 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-4500M and Athlon 64 FX-51, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-4500M
A8-4500M
AMD Athlon 64 FX-51
Athlon 64 FX-51

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 321 vote

Rate A8-4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Athlon 64 FX-51 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-4500M or Athlon 64 FX-51, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.