Atom C3808 vs A8-3530MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A8-3530MX and Atom C3808 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2422not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Atom
Power efficiency2.12no data
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$369

Detailed specifications

A8-3530MX and Atom C3808 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2 GHz
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache128 KB (per core)672 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)12 MB
L3 cache0 KB12 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size228 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data86 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-3530MX and Atom C3808 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFS1FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-3530MX and Atom C3808. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6620Gno data
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

A8-3530MX and Atom C3808 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3530MX and Atom C3808 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3530MX and Atom C3808. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4: 2133
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6620Gno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-3530MX and Atom C3808.

PCIe versionno data3
PCI Express lanesno data16
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data16
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data16
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x10/2.5/1 GBE

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 June 2011 15 August 2017
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 25 Watt

Atom C3808 has an age advantage of 6 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A8-3530MX and Atom C3808. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A8-3530MX is a notebook processor while Atom C3808 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-3530MX and Atom C3808, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-3530MX
A8-3530MX
Intel Atom C3808
Atom C3808

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 66 votes

Rate A8-3530MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3808 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-3530MX or Atom C3808, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.